| Suche | Sortierung nach | Monatsdigest | ||
![]() |
2006/08/19 11:08:13 GDiers9488 Re: [OL] How to decipher old handwriting? |
Datum | 2006/08/19 18:40:46 E. Bomhof [OL] Bomhof(f), Bonhof(f), Bohnhof(f) |
![]() |
![]() |
2006/08/19 11:08:13 GDiers9488 Re: [OL] How to decipher old handwriting? |
Betreff | 2006/08/22 16:11:01 Ahnenforschung Familie Timphaus Re: [OL] How to decipher old handwriting? |
![]() |
![]() |
2006/08/16 19:41:42 Werner Honkomp Re: [OL] Rollman's of Neuekirchen |
Autor | 2006/08/21 10:57:18 Werner Honkomp Re: [OL] Meyer-Holzgrefe in Bokern, Damme |
![]() |
Date: 2006/08/19 15:36:51
From: Werner Honkomp <werner(a)honkomp.de>
Could it be "Cumberland" in Maryland? Former the "u" was allways overstrike. Werner > Hallo List, > We need some assistance in reading old handwriting from late 1700s and > early > 1800s church records. > There is a first letter of a word that looks like a 2 in modern > handwriting. > "Ludovicus de Heise Wa??is (or in) im gu(or gri)unreadable von > 2umbarland." > (Or what looks to be barland - it may be barlant or barlaut.) > Do any of you have an idea about that 2 looking letter? The 2 has a curl > on > the top if that helps. Also, in the old handwriting, was the overstrike > over > the letter u as common as it is today? > Thanks for any assistance. > Courtenay Ochs > Oldenburg-L mailing list > Oldenburg-L(a)genealogy.net > http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/oldenburg-l