Suche Sortierung nach Monatsdigest
2007/02/07 04:19:38
J b
Re: [HN] Nicknames		 Datum 2007/02/07 06:47:47
R&B Stewart
Re: [HN] Celle: Catharina Beijker
2007/02/07 03:22:54
J b
Re: [HN] FELDHUSEN in Meyenburg		 Betreff 2007/02/07 10:18:52
J b
Re: [HN] FELDHUSEN in Meyenburg
2007/02/07 01:51:54
gale
Re: [HN] FELDHUSEN in Meyenburg		 Autor 2007/02/07 17:32:56
gale
Re: [HN] FELDHUSEN in Meyenburg

Re: [HN] FELDHUSEN in Meyenburg

Date: 2007/02/07 05:21:05
From: gale <gale(a)bosche.info>

HI JB:

Your thoughts are valid, but in this case we are
communicating with Barbara - No full mailbox. (the response for a full mailbox is normally "undeliverable due to full mailbox"), however, there are a lot of programs out there. Also others on the same list are not being screened.

Gale

On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:22:44 -0800
 "J b" <johnbrene(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Gale <gale(a)bosche.info> wrote:
I concur with Barbara. There are two primary reasons mail
is returned. One is that the address is nonexistant and
the second is that it was incorrectly written.

There are two others you are overlooking beyond the two "biggies" already mentioned. One is that the recipient's inbox is full, and since it has exceeded its volume allowance, it rejects anything more in the way of incoming mail heading its way. This can be corrected by simply making adequate space available. The other is due to overly aggressive/restrictive SPAM filters or rules in place, generally at the e-mail client end but occasionally connected to the firewall. These can either be via broad restrictions (rules in place, to include the rejection of attachments) or targeted to specific e mail or URL addresses (often times set accidentally).

You'd be wise to check all for all of these possibilities if this continues.

Jb

_________________________________________________________________
Check out all that glitters with the MSN Entertainment Guide to the Academy Awards® http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline2